T H E
E S S E N C E
O F
R E L I G I O N
". . . but none of them
have sufficiently included
the core of religion . . . namely,
direct spiritual experience."
- Ken Wilber

"Have you thought of
one of the other major religions?
They're pretty much all the same."
- Reverend Lovejoy from The Simpsons
Your dedicated, trusty, and loveable LiveReal Agents
in our mettle-testing, gut-churning quest
have emerged, alive and intact,
with the raw, early sketches of our findings in
three articles:
"The Perennial Philosophy: The Evidence"
begins with some of the fundamental questions
about religion: where did all of these groups, rituals, beliefs,
holy books, funny clothes . . . come from?
And more importantly . . . out of all the thousands
of different religions in the world, which one or ones are "right"?
Are they all "right"? What about the ways that they all
disagree?
With so
many different religions coming together today in a worldwide
spiritual culture clash - and with each one claiming to be right,
accurate, truthful, or even "the One" - how does anyone
(who isn't already aligned with one particular tradition, or even
who is) make sense of it?
From Catholicism
to Calvinism, Buddhism to Islam, Judaism to Lutheranism .
. . traditional to progressive, modern to historical . . . among
the thousands of spiritual organizations and movements thriving
today . . . how and why did these groups get started? What were
they like back when they first got started? What were they like,
before they evolved into what they are today?
Or in another way, if we subtract and strip
away everything that is non-essential - if we reduce them all down
to their most basic, elemental, fundamental components . . . then
what is the core, the root, the origin of religion? And further,
if we were to strip away all the non-essentials, what are we left
with? (Take a minister: if a minister didn't wear a suit instead
of a robe, would he still be a minister? Sure. If a minister didn't
carry a Bible, would he still be a minister? Sure. If he didn't
quote the Bible directly, but used all the same words or meanings
. . . and so on. Continuing down this line, eventually we should
arrive at what is "essential.")
The LiveReal
Agents,
at least this far in our quest,
have made some pretty interesting discoveries:
Essentially, all of the books, rituals, buildings, and holy books
of all religions trace back to one common ancestor: one person having
a direct spiritual experience.
In other words, Christianity is based on the
spiritual experience of Jesus. Buddhism is based on the spiritual
experiences of Buddha. Islam is based on the spiritual experience
of Mohammed. Taoism is based on the spiritual experiences of Lao-Tzu.
And so on.
The evidence
we have discovered so far points to a pretty fascinating
conclusion: all spiritual movements, when traced back to their origins,
eventually lead back to some sort of direct experience by the founders
of these movements - concrete, actual experiences which are, of
themselves, independent of their own time period, cultural trappings,
and personal constructs.
In these cases, certain individuals witnessed
or experienced . . . something . . . extraordinary, uncommon, and
what they believed to be immensely profound. And further, these
experiences, when described and compared, often have a very similar
ring.
True, or Not?
See for yourself.
To
view the article
and participate in the discussion
Enter |
To
join and keep going,
click here to
Subscribe |
"Common Heart: An Experience of Inter-Religious
Dialogue" by Ken Wilber tells the story of actual human
beings from virtually all of the major world religions, meeting
together in one place, and having a discussion about their differences
and their commonalities . . .
Click
here to read it . . .
"Common Denominators of Major Religions"
presents a different scenario.
Imagine this:
If Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, Lao-Tzu, Confucious
were all sitting around a table together (and speaking the same
language) . . .
. . . what would they find in common?
Today,
so many different religious,
spiritual, and pseudo-spiritual movements are colliding with each
other in a massive, constant culture clash.
And when cultures
collide, typically one of three things happen:
either one culture will conquer and consume the other one;
the two will keep a respectful distance for as long as possible;
or
they will find common ground that they agree on, and learn from
one another with mutual benefit.
Common Denominators
is our investigation of this third option: when Christianity
meets Buddhism, when Hinduism meets Taoism, when Islam meets Christianity
. . .
. . . what do they agree on?
To
view the article
and participate in the discussion
Members
Enter
|
To
join and keep going,
click here to
Subscribe |
Related Articles
What
is "God"?
Spiritual
Stuff: Who Cares?
The
Modern Spiritual Melting Pot
|